<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Google Chrome &#8211; the new browser on the block</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatwasithinking.co.uk/2008/09/03/on-google-chrome-the-new-browser-on-the-block/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatwasithinking.co.uk/2008/09/03/on-google-chrome-the-new-browser-on-the-block/</link>
	<description>A Flash Development, Information Architecture, SEO &#38; Web Design Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:59:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James B</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwasithinking.co.uk/2008/09/03/on-google-chrome-the-new-browser-on-the-block/#comment-3557</link>
		<dc:creator>James B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 10:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatwasithinking.co.uk/?p=103#comment-3557</guid>
		<description>I just did some tests navigating through Facebook pages and found that compared to IE, Firefox generally loads pages in 60% of the time and Google Chrome loads pages in 30-50% of the time. That&#039;s an awesome time saving. It&#039;s like having the website on a different server.

For my own use, the most important thing Chrome needs next is the ability to edit source. Couldn&#039;t believe that wasn&#039;t included up front.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just did some tests navigating through Facebook pages and found that compared to IE, Firefox generally loads pages in 60% of the time and Google Chrome loads pages in 30-50% of the time. That&#8217;s an awesome time saving. It&#8217;s like having the website on a different server.</p>
<p>For my own use, the most important thing Chrome needs next is the ability to edit source. Couldn&#8217;t believe that wasn&#8217;t included up front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave K</title>
		<link>http://www.whatwasithinking.co.uk/2008/09/03/on-google-chrome-the-new-browser-on-the-block/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatwasithinking.co.uk/?p=103#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Nice review...Installed chrome a few hours ago and very impressed with the import FF3 settings feature. Not to impressed with the problems I get navigating through facebook albums. (it seems to stick on a photo and if you click next flips forward one then instantly flips back!) Still really quick, efficient and nice looking! Now all I need is mouse gestures! How long before its more popular than firefox? I give it 6 months. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review&#8230;Installed chrome a few hours ago and very impressed with the import FF3 settings feature. Not to impressed with the problems I get navigating through facebook albums. (it seems to stick on a photo and if you click next flips forward one then instantly flips back!) Still really quick, efficient and nice looking! Now all I need is mouse gestures! How long before its more popular than firefox? I give it 6 months. <img src='http://www.whatwasithinking.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

